Vulnerable birth mothers and repeat losses of infants to public care: Is targeted reproductive health care ethically defensible?

Shaw, Mike, Kershaw, Sophie, Broadhurst, Karen, Harwin, Judith, Alrouh, Bachar, Pilling, Mark and Mason, Claire (2015) Vulnerable birth mothers and repeat losses of infants to public care: Is targeted reproductive health care ethically defensible? The Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law . ISSN 0964-9069 Full text available

[img]
Preview
PDF (Vulnerable birth mothers (pre-print))
JSWFLVulnerableBirthMothers.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (440kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article aims to advance debate about the ethics of targeted reproductive health care for birth mothers who have experienced recurrent care proceedings. Making reference to new research eviden ce that reports the scale of the problem of repeat care proceedings in England, the article considers the role that enhanced reproductive health care might play in helping mothers exit a cycle of care proceedings. Emerging practice initiatives are introduced which are all stretching the boundaries of statutory intervention, by working intensively with mothers following removal of children to public care. The central argument of this paper is that a positive interpretation of rights provides a warrant for pr oviding enhanced access to contraception, but this must be part and parcel of a holistic, recovery focused approach to intervention. C aution is also raised in respect of the reasons that may lie behind a pattern of rapid repeat pregnancy for this particular group of women. Issues of loss and grief are clear complicating factors in reproductive decision - making where an infant or child has been removed to public care, the magnitude of which must be firmly acknowledged. Charting novel theoretical gro und, discussion draws on a conceptual vocabulary from the literature on other forms of perinatal loss, suggesting that the notion of ‘replacement baby’ may help to explain why some mothers are caught in this negative cycle. Although this article is prompte d by escalating concerns about the human and economic costs of repeat care proceedings in England, discussion will be relevant to a number of international contexts such as the U.S.A. Canada and Australia where cognate systems of child protection give rise to similar patterns.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Published online: 20 Jan 2015
Subjects: Children, Young People and Developmental Pyschology > Babies
Families > Mother Child Relations
Department/People: Children, Young Adult and Family Services
URI: https://repository.tavistockandportman.ac.uk/id/eprint/914

Actions (Library Staff login required)

View Item View Item